Keywords
parody
Byzantine exegetics
paradox
theology
How to Cite
Abstract
Many modern scholars consider the Old Testament book of Jonah being written in a boldly parodic manner. The narrative engages many details that sound humorous for a modern reader. However, from the standpoint of late Antique and early Medieval patristic exegesis, it is often unclear whether Byzantine interpreters perceived such passages laughable or at least inappropriate for a prophetic writing. This study presents a few examples of early Byzantine commentaries to the episode with Jonah and a gourd (Jonah 4:6–11). None of the commentaries expresses any explicit amusement caused by the discussed text. However, the style, method, or context of each commentary appears to be passing the traditional bounds of Bible interpretation. The earlier interpreters adhere to the most expected moral reading of Jonah 4, but they use epithets, metaphors, or omissions, which produce the effect of paradox comparable to the biblical wording itself. The later commentaries tend to involve unexpected and even provocative senses. In such interpretations, God can be thought of as being able to play with a human or even to fool and deceive. What seems us humorous in the Bible, Byzantine commentators take primarily as a paradox, which they did not explain or remove but elaborate further paradoxically. The later an interpreter is, the bolder his paradoxical approach appears. The results of the study provide some clues to understanding how the interpretation of humorous, parodic, or ironical passages were developing in the history of Byzantine intellectual culture.
References
Attardo, S. (2007). ‘Irony as relevant inappropriateness’, in Gibbs, R. W., Jr. & Colston, H. L. (eds.), Irony in Language and Thought: A Cognitive Science Reader, New York, London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 135-170.
Band, A. J. (1990). ‘Swallowing Jonah: The eclipse of parody’. Prooftexts 10 (2), Tenth Anniversary Volume, part 2, pp. 177-195.
Beekes, R. (2010). Etymological Dictionary of Greek, vol. 1. Leiden, Boston: Brill.
Berlin, A. (1976). ‘A rejoinder to John A. Miles, Jr., with some observations on the nature of prophecy’. The Jewish Quarterly Review, New Series 66 (4), pp. 227-235.
Burgess, H. (1853). The Repentance of Nineveh, a Metrical Homily on the Mission of Jonah, by Ephraem Syrus. London: R. B. Blackader; Berlin: Asher and Co.
Clark, H. H. & Gerrig, R. J. (2007). ‘On the pretense theory of irony’, in Gibbs, R. W., Jr. & Colston, H. L. (eds.), Irony in Language and Thought: A Cognitive Science Reader, New York, London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 25-33.
Constas, M., ed. (2018). St. Maximos the Confessor. On Difficulties in Sacred Scripture: The Responses to Thalassios. Washington, D. C.: The Catholic University of America Press.
Constas, N. (2004). ‘The last temptation of Satan: Divine deception in Greek patristic interpretations of the Passion narrative’. The Harvard Theological Review 97 (2), pp. 139-163.
Datema, C., ed. (1970). Asterius of Amasea. Homilies I-XIV. Leiden: Brill.
Declerck, J. H. (ed.) (1982). Maximi Confessoris Quaestiones et dubia (CCSG 10). Turnhout: Brepols.
Dozeman, Th. B. (1989). ‘Inner-Biblical interpretation of Yahweh’s gracious and compassionate character’. Journal of Biblical Literature 108 (2), pp. 207-223.
Falls, Th. B., (ed.) (2008). Writings of Saint Justin Martyr. Washington, D. C.: The Catholic University of America Press.
Ferreiro, A., (ed.) (2003). Ancient Christian Commentary on Scripture. Old Testament. Vol. 14. The Twelve Prophets. Downers Grove, Illinois: InterVarsity Press.
Field, F. (1875). Origenes Hexaplorum … Fragmenta. 2 vols. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Fisher, E. J. (1977). ‘The divine comedy: Humor in the Bible’. Religious Education: The official journal of the Religious Education Association 72 (6), pp. 571-579. DOI: 10.1080/0034408770720602.
Frantzolas, K.G., ed. (1998) Hosiou Ephraim tou Syrou Erga [Ὁσίου Ἐφραίμ τοῦ Σύρου ἔργα] vol. 7. Thessaloniki: Perivoli tis Panagias (in Greek).
Friedman, H. H. (2000). ‘Humor in the Hebrew Bible’. Humor 13 (3), pp. 257-285.
Friedman, H. H. (2002).‘Is there humor in the Hebrew Bible? A rejoinder’. Humor 15 (2), pp. 215-222.
Goodspeed, E. J. (ed.) (1915). ‘Justinus Martyr. Dialogus cum Tryphone’. Die ältesten Apologeten. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck u. Ruprecht, pp. 90-265.
Halliwell, S. (2008). Greek Laughter: A Study of Cultural Psychology from Homer to Early Christianity. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.
Hauser, A. J. (1985). ‘Jonah: In pursuit of the Dove’. Journal of Biblical Literature 104 (1), pp. 21-37.
Hazard, M. C. (1919). ‘Humor in the Bible’. The Biblical World 53 (5), pp. 514-519.
Heikel, I. A. (ed.) (1913). Eusebius Werke, 6. Band. Leipzig, Hinrichs.
Heil, G. & Ritter, A. M. (eds.) (2012). Pseudo-Dionysius Areopagita. De Coelesti Hierarchia, De Ecclesiastica Hierarchia, De Mystica Theologia, Epistulae, 2. Aufl. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter.
Hill, R. C. (ed.) (2004). Theodore of Mopsuestia. Commentary on the Twelve Prophets. Washington, D. C.: The Catholic University of America Press.
Hill, R. C. (ed.) (2008). St. Cyril of Alexandria. Commentary on the Twelve Prophets, vol. 2. Washington, D. C.: The Catholic University of America Press.
Hoffmann, R. J. (ed.) (1994). Porphyry’s Against the Christians: The Literary Remains. New York: Prometheus Books.
Janick, J. & Paris, H. S. (2006). ‘Jonah and the “gourd” at Nineveh: Consequences of a classic mistranslation’. Holmes G. J., ed., Cucurbitaceae 2006 (Conference proceedings), pp. 349-357. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/273124954_JONAH_AND_THE_GOURD_AT_NINEVEH_CONSEQUENCES_OF_A_CLASSIC_MISTRANSLATION
Kim, H. Ch. P. (2007). ‘Jonah read intertextually’. Journal of Biblical Literature 126 (3), pp. 497-528.
Koetschau, P. (ed.) (1899). Origenes Werke, 2. Bd. Leipzig: Hinrichs.
Kubat, R. (2014). ’Memra of Ephrem the Syrian of Jonah and the repentance of the Ninevites’. Θεολογία/Theologia, part Β’ 85 (4), pp.197-210.
Laga, C. & Steel, C. (eds.) (1990). Maximus Confessor, Johannes Scotus Eriugena. Quaestiones ad Thalassium II: Quaestiones LVI-LXV, una cum latina interpretatione Ioannis Scotti Eriugenae (CCSG 22). Turnhout: Brepols.
Lampe, G. W. H. (1961). A Patristic Greek Lexicon. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Lichtert, C. (2005a). ‘Un siècle de recherche à propos de Jonas (1re partie)’. Revue Biblique 112 (2), pp. 192-214.
Lichtert, C. (2005b). ‘Un siècle de recherche à propos de Jonas (2e partie)’. Revue Biblique 112 (3), pp. 330-354.
Liddell, H. G., Scott, R. & Jones, H. S. (1996). A Greek-English Lexicon. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Maas, P. & Trypanis, C. A. (eds.) (1963). Sancti Romani Melodi cantica: Cantica genuina. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Malingrey, A.-M., (ed.) (1961). Jean Chrysostome. Sur la providence de Dieu (SC 79). Paris: Cerf.
Malingrey, A.-M. (ed.) (1970). Jean Chrysostome. Sur l’incompréhensibilité de Dieu, vol. 1, hom. 1-5 (SC 28 bis). Paris: Cerf.
Mallett, F. J. (1930). ‘Does the Bible contain humor?’. Review & Expositor 27 (3), pp. 304-310.
Marcovich, M. (ed.) (2001). Origenes Contra Celsum Libri VIII (Vigiliae Christianae suppl. 54). Leiden, Boston, Köln: Brill.
Mather, J. (1982). ‘The comic art of the book of Jonah’. Soundings: An Interdisciplinary Journal 65 (3), pp. 280-291.
Matons, J. G. de (ed.) (1981). Romanos le Mélode. Hymnes, vol. 5. Paris: Cerf.
Miles, J. A., Jr. (1975). ‘Laughing at the Bible: Jonah as parody’. The Jewish Quarterly Review, New Series 65 (3), pp. 168-181 (reprinted in: Radday & Brenner 1990: 203-215).
Moberly, R. W. L. (2003). ‘Preaching for a response? Jonah’s message to the Ninevites reconsidered’. Vetus Testamentum 53 (2), pp. 156-168.
Morreall, J. (1989). ‘The rejection of humor in Western thought’. Philosophy East and West 39 (3), pp. 243-265.
Morreall, J. (2001). ‘Sarcasm, irony, wordplay, and humor in the Hebrew Bible: A response to Hershey Friedman’. Humor 14 (3), pp. 293-301.
Ostriker, A. (2005). ‘Jonah: The book of the question’. The Georgia Review 59 (2), pp. 278-293.
Pelli, M. (1979–1980). ‘The literary art of Jonah’. Hebrew Studies 20/21, pp. 18-28.
Peters, K. (2018). ‘Jonah 1 and the battle with the sea: Myth and irony’. Scandinavian Journal of the Old Testament 32 (2), pp. 157-165. DOI: 10.1080/09018328.2018.1470843
Prikhodko, M. A. (2021). ‘Irony and heroism: On the fragment of Origen's treatise Contra Celsum 7.53–58’. The European Journal of Humour Research 9 (2). 52-62.
Pusey, P. E. (ed.) (1965 [1868]). Sancti patris nostri Cyrilli archiepiscopi Alexandrini in XII prophetas, vol. 1. Brussels: Culture et Civilisation.
Radday, Y. T. & Brenner, A. (eds.) (1990). On Humour and the Comic in the Hebrew Bible. Worcester: The Almond Press.
Rorem, P. (1984). Biblical and liturgical symbols within the Pseudo-Dionysian synthesis. Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies.
Saroglou, V. (2002). ‘Humor appreciation as function of religious dimensions’. Archiv für Religionspsychologie 24, pp. 144-153.
Sorlin, H. & Neyrand, L. (eds.) (1988). Jean Chrysostome. Commentaire sur Job. Tome 2 (SC 348). Paris: Cerf.
Suchla, B. R. (ed.) (1990). Corpus Dionysiacum I: Pseudo-Dionysius Areopagita. De divinis nominibus. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Yee, G. A. (1988). ‘The anatomy of Biblical parody: The dirge form in 2 Samuel 1 and Isaiah 14’. The Catholic Biblical Quarterly 50 (4), 50th Anniversary Volume, pp. 565-586.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2021 The European Journal of Humour Research