Book review
VIEW FULL TEXT

How to Cite

Chovanec, J. (2022). Book review: Thomas C. Messerli. (2021). Repetition in Telecinematic Humour. How US American sitcoms employ formal and semantic repetition in the construction of multimodal humour. Freiburg: Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg . The European Journal of Humour Research, 10(3), 226–230. Retrieved from https://www.europeanjournalofhumour.org/ejhr/article/view/697

Abstract

Book review

VIEW FULL TEXT

References

Attardo, S. (2001). Humorous Texts: A Semantic and Pragmatic Analysis. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Attardo, S. & Raskin, V. (1991). ‘Script theory revis(it)ed: Joke similarity and joke representation model’. Humor 4 (3/4), pp. 293–347.

Bateson, G. (1953). ‘The position of humor in human communication’, in von Foerster, H. (ed.), Cybernetics Ninth Conference. New York, NY: Josiah Macy Jr. Foundation, pp. 1–25.

Bednarek, M. (2010). The Language of Fictional Television: Drama and Identity. London: Continuum.

Bell, N. D. (2009). ‘Impolite responses to failed humour’ in Norrick, N. R. & Chiaro, D. (eds.), Humour in Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 143–163.

Brock, A. (2015). ‘Participation frameworks and participation in televised sitcom, candid camera and stand-up comedy’, in Dynel, M. & Chovanec, J. (eds.), Participation in Public and Social Media Interactions. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 27–47.

Bubel, C. M. (2008). ‘Film audiences as overhearers’. Journal of Pragmatics 40 (1), pp. 55–71.

Chovanec, J. & Dynel, M. (2015). ‘Researching interactional forms and participant structures in public and social media’, in Dynel, M. & Chovanec, J. (eds.), Participation in Public and Social Media Interactions. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 1–23.

Clark, H. H. (1996). Using Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Dynel, M. (2011b). ‘Stranger than fiction? A few methodological notes on linguistic research in film discourse’. Brno Studies in English 37 (1), pp. 41–61.

Dynel, M. (2008). ‘There is method in the humorous speaker’s madness: humour and Grice’s model’. Łódz Papers in Pragmatics 4 (1), pp. 159–185.

Dynel, M. (2011a). ‘“I’ll be there for you”: on participation-based sitcom humour’, in Dynel, M. (ed.), The Pragmatics of Humour across Discourse Domains. Amsterdam and Philadelphia, pp. 311–333.

Ermida, I. (2008). The Language of Comic Narratives. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Goffman, E. (1979). ‘Footing’. Semiotica 25 (1–2), pp. 1–29.

Kotthoff, H. (1999). ‘Coherent keying in conversational humour: contextualising joint fictionalisation’, in Bublitz, W., Lenk, U. & Ventola, E. (eds.), Coherence in Spoken and Written Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 125–150.

Messerli, T. C. (2017). ‘Sitcom humour as ventriloquism’. Lingua 197, pp. 16–33.

Norrick, N. R. (1993). Conversational Joking: Humor in Everyday Talk. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Suls, J. M. (1972). ‘A two-stage model for the appreciation of jokes and cartoons: an information-processing analysis’, in Goldstein, J. H. & McGhee, P. E. (eds.), The Psychology of Humor: Theoretical Perspectives and Empirical Issues. New York, N.Y.: Academic Press, pp. 81–100.

Yus, F. (2016). Humour and Relevance. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2022 The European Journal of Humour Research

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.